 |
||||||||
                                                                       Subscribe To This Site       |
| |||||||
Darby Mullins urged in his defence, that he served under the king's commission, and therefore could not disobey his commander without incurring great punishments; that whenever a ship or ships went out upon any expedition under the king's commission, the men were never allowed to call their officers to an account, why they did this, or why they did that, because such a liberty would destroy all discipline; that if any thing was done which was unlawful, the officers were to answer it, for the men did no more than their duty in obeying orders.
He was told by the court, that acting under the commission justified in what was lawful, but not in what was unlawful.
He answered, he stood in need of nothing to justify him in what was lawful, but the case of seamen must be very hard, if they must be brought into such danger for obeying the commands of their officers, and punished for not obeying them; and if they were allowed to dispute the orders, there could be no such thing as command kept up at sea.
Captain Kidds trial was not a fair trial - looks like he was railroaded, as the saying goes.
The World Is Your Oyster - Where Do You Want To Go?